~ Metaphysical Mathematics ~

This chapter describes the natures of instances and entities in crude mathematical terms. Though its somewhat paradoxical to talk in terms of metaphysical mathematics, the kind of mathematics used here is not at all conventional – neither is it necessarily logical. Conventional mathematics is the language of physical science, and a means of understanding the physical universe in man’s own subjective way. The language of metaphysical science is a means of understanding the Cosmos at large, and is thus limited neither to logic nor reason. Equations have specifically been left out and words used in their stead.

Instances

An instance is pure, unorganized Consciousness. An instance is therefore Self/God. What sparks off consciousness, however, is Will, for one cannot be conscious without the will to be conscious. Nothing can be said about an instance, so there is simply no way of knowing anything about it. One can therefore not even claim for it to exist. All concepts, no matter how complex, always encapsulate to just one single instance. It is for this reason that an instance represents the true nature of Self/God, for this is the embodiment of all things.

Entities

An entity is an organization of consciousness. The fundamental entity equations are as follows:

Being Entities (A is)

A being entity is an entity that has “being”. We therefore say that the entity “is”. It is the Purest Form of energy (organized consciousness). A being entity has no known properties, and so nothing can be said about it other than that it “is”. In error, many understand this to be “God”. God, in fact transcends energy. It is pure consciousness (both unorganized and organized).

A being entity does not necessarily exist, since existence would then be an attribute of the entity – the fact that it exists. I’m not saying that a being entity does not exist. I’m saying that it doesn’t necessarily have to. In this way, a being entity transcends existence (and indeed all things in existence).

Altered states of consciousness can arrive at a more meaningful realization of the essence of oneself as a Being Entity. This is the Crown Chakra state of consciousness (see the chapter on the Chakras for details) where one is found simply to “Be”.

Non-Being entities (A is not)

A non-being entity is an entity that has “non-being”. We therefore say that the entity is “not”*.

* We are not saying that the entity “isn’t”. Rather we are saying what it is; and what it is, is “not”.

Again this entity has no known attributes. So nothing at all can be said about it, other than that it is “not”. Some people refer to “God” in this way. They would say for example that God is “not”. They don’t want to say what God is, because they simply don’t know. So they say what God is “not”, for example:

Normal entities (A is A)

These entities refer to all entities in creation. They exist, for they are organizations of energy, perceived as “the created”. All normal entities are each themselves and nothing else. A pen is that same pen, a horse that same horse, an idea that same idea.

Entities being other entities (A is B)

Ordinarily, something can never be something else. A hammer can’t be a nail for example. In abstract terms, though, it is possible for an entity to be another entity. For something to be something else would require both entities to simultaneously propagate each other. So entity A is the creator of entity B, and entity B the creator of entity A. The created would be the fullest realization of the creator, for the creator and the created would be one and the same. Both need each other for either to exist.

There are many such entities. Here are but a few:

An entity “hot”, for example, needs entity “cold”, whilst entity “cold” needs entity “hot” for either to exist. And when they exist, they exist as “temperature”.

Entities not being other entities (A is not B)

The illusion of individuality has it that any one entity is all that what another entity is not. Such is the nature of the Lie that is an incarnation. The truth, however, is that Consciousness (Self/God), through Will, manifests all things as expressions of Oneself.

A’s relationship to ~~A

Logically A always necessarily equals ~~A, where “~” means “not”. Metaphysically however, this is not true - A does not always necessarily equal ~~A. The logical illustration of A=~~A is as follows:

A = !!A

Area A is logically identical to the area outside of the area outside area A (! = not).

This illustration shows the top view of area A on a plane (x, z). In logical terms, everything outside of everything outside of area A is always area A.

We need to show, however, that in abstract terms, this is not always necessarily the case. Here’s how.

To attain to a greater understanding of area A, the area needs to be seen in a different way. To do this, a dimension perpendicular to the plane (x, z) needs to be introduced.

Instance A

Plane A as found in the 3rd dimension.

Since the original logical area can now be seen through another dimension, the area becomes a cylinder of infinite length along the y-axis.

Metaphysical Cylinder

The above cylinder holds the metaphysical essence of A as an infinite number of logical instances of A.

Instance A is on the logical plane (x, z). So too is area ~A (not shown). Area ~A is everything outside of A on the same plane.

A Practical Example:
Lets say that instance A is a “coin”, and that the y-axis represents the dimension “color”. Movement along the y-axis therefore brings the meaning of “color” to the coin.

When in area A, we speak of a “coin”. When not in area A, we speak of all that which is “not that coin”. This is of course the world outside the coin.

Because of the “color” dimension, we can establish something about the coin’s color. We may therefore say, for example, that the coin is gold. This may be represented as area “A(+1)”. Saying that the coin’s color is “more yellow than blue”, may be represented as area “A(-1)”.

Area A(+1) is different from area A, for the former speaks of an entity “gold coin” whilst the latter only of an instance “coin”.

As you can see, everything outside of everything outside of area A is not always necessarily area A, because sometimes it’s area A(+1) and sometimes it’s A(-1).

In our example, when speaking of all that which is outside of all that which is outside of the coin, we do arrive back at the coin yes, but not necessarily the same instance of the coin. This is because its possible for other things about the coin’s color to have been discovered, thus converting the coin from an instance, where nothing can be said about it, to an entity, where something about it (it’s color) can now be said. The dimension, shown as the y-axis, represents the potentially infinite realizations of instance A. Dimension is thus Lucifer, the so-called "Angel of Enlightenment" – the bringer of genius.

Logically, for A to equal ~~A, there is no movement along the y-axis, since any instance is always everything other than everything other than itself.

Illogically, for A to not equal ~~A, a movement along the y-axis occurs, since it is not logically true that something isn't everything other than everything other than itself.

Movement along the y-axis means that we could end up on another plane, say plane B. So saying metaphysically that A¹~~A is then actually the same thing as saying logically that A¹~~B, or A¹B, which is logically sound.

Movement along the y-axis is thought, the vehicle of energy. Being still on the y-axis is the state of an illusionary conclusion – the sign of a sound but lazy mind. It is where energy is pooled and the created have form. This is after all how one has come to know and work with what is so logically perceived to be reality and the laws and principles that govern it. This is the nature of one’s illusionary incarnation.

To be free along the y-axis is to be spiritually free – free to channel and pool energy, through will, as and when desired. To do anything else is to be but a concentration of energy – a part and parcel of creation, in existence and nothing more.

In Summary